For Christmas I received a fascinating gift from a friend - my very own "very popular" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (fantastic title) bears my name and freechat.mytakeonit.org my photo on its cover, and it has radiant evaluations.

Yet it was entirely composed by AI, with a few easy triggers about me supplied by my friend Janet.

It's an intriguing read, and uproarious in parts. But it likewise meanders rather a lot, and is somewhere between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It simulates my chatty style of writing, however it's likewise a bit repetitive, and very verbose. It might have exceeded Janet's triggers in looking at data about me.

Several sentences begin "as a leading technology journalist ..." - cringe - which could have been scraped from an online bio.

There's also a mysterious, repetitive hallucination in the form of my cat (I have no animals). And there's a metaphor on almost every page - some more random than others.

There are lots of companies online offering AI-book writing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I contacted the chief executive Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he informed me he had sold around 150,000 personalised books, primarily in the US, given that rotating from assembling AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A copy of your own 240-page long best-seller costs ₤ 26. The company utilizes its own AI tools to produce them, based on an open source large language design.

I'm not asking you to purchase my book. Actually you can't - just Janet, who created it, can order any further copies.

There is currently no barrier to anybody creating one in anybody's name, including celebrities - although Mr Mashiach says there are guardrails around violent material. Each book includes a printed disclaimer specifying that it is fictional, produced by AI, and developed "solely to bring humour and joy".

Legally, the copyright belongs to the firm, but Mr Mashiach worries that the product is intended as a "personalised gag present", and the books do not get offered even more.

He wishes to expand his range, generating various categories such as sci-fi, and perhaps providing an autobiography service. It's developed to be a light-hearted form of customer AI - offering AI-generated goods to human consumers.

It's likewise a bit frightening if, like me, you compose for a living. Not least since it probably took less than a minute to generate, and it does, definitely in some parts, sound simply like me.

Musicians, vmeste-so-vsemi.ru authors, artists and actors worldwide have actually revealed alarm about their work being used to train generative AI tools that then produce comparable material based upon it.

"We need to be clear, when we are speaking about data here, we actually imply human creators' life works," says Ed Newton Rex, creator of Fairly Trained, which campaigns for AI companies to regard developers' rights.

"This is books, this is posts, this is images. It's artworks. It's records ... The whole point of AI training is to find out how to do something and then do more like that."

In 2023 a tune including AI-generated voices of Canadian vocalists Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social media before being pulled from streaming platforms due to the fact that it was not their work and they had actually not granted it. It didn't stop the track's developer trying to nominate it for a Grammy award. And even though the artists were phony, it was still wildly popular.

"I do not believe using generative AI for innovative functions should be banned, but I do think that generative AI for these functions that is trained on people's work without approval need to be prohibited," Mr Newton Rex adds. "AI can be really effective but let's construct it ethically and relatively."

OpenAI states Chinese competitors using its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes industry and damages America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - including the BBC - have chosen to block AI designers from trawling their online material for training functions. Others have actually chosen to team up - the Financial Times has actually partnered with ChatGPT creator OpenAI for example.

The UK federal government is considering an overhaul of the law that would permit AI designers to use developers' material on the internet to help develop their designs, unless the rights holders opt out.

Ed Newton Rex explains this as "insanity".

He points out that AI can make advances in locations like defence, healthcare and logistics without trawling the work of authors, reporters and artists.

"All of these things work without going and changing copyright law and destroying the livelihoods of the nation's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, photorum.eclat-mauve.fr a crossbench peer in your home of Lords, is also strongly versus removing copyright law for AI.

"Creative markets are wealth creators, 2.4 million jobs and a whole lot of pleasure," says the Baroness, who is likewise a consultant to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The government is weakening one of its best performing markets on the vague pledge of development."

A government representative stated: "No relocation will be made till we are definitely positive we have a practical plan that delivers each of our goals: increased control for right holders to help them certify their content, access to premium material to train leading AI models in the UK, and more transparency for right holders from AI developers."

Under the UK federal government's new AI strategy, a nationwide information library including public data from a broad variety of sources will likewise be made readily available to AI scientists.

In the US the future of federal guidelines to manage AI is now up in the air following President Trump's return to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that intended to boost the safety of AI with, among other things, companies in the sector needed to share details of the operations of their systems with the US federal government before they are released.

But this has now been reversed by Trump. It remains to be seen what Trump will do instead, but he is stated to want the AI sector to face less guideline.

This comes as a number of lawsuits versus AI companies, and especially against OpenAI, continue in the US. They have actually been taken out by everyone from the New york city Times to authors, music labels, and wiki.dulovic.tech even a comedian.

They declare that the AI companies broke the law when they took their content from the internet without their permission, and used it to train their systems.

The AI business argue that their actions fall under "reasonable use" and are therefore exempt. There are a number of aspects which can constitute fair use - it's not a straight-forward meaning. But the AI sector is under increasing examination over how it collects training information and whether it should be spending for it.

If this wasn't all sufficient to ponder, Chinese AI company DeepSeek has shaken the sector over the previous week. It ended up being the a lot of downloaded complimentary app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek claims that it developed its innovation for a fraction of the rate of the similarity OpenAI. Its success has actually raised security issues in the US, and threatens American's existing supremacy of the sector.

When it comes to me and a career as an author, I think that at the minute, if I really want a "bestseller" I'll still have to compose it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the current weakness in generative AI tools for larger jobs. It is complete of inaccuracies and hallucinations, and it can be quite difficult to read in parts because it's so verbose.

But provided how quickly the tech is progressing, valetinowiki.racing I'm not sure how long I can remain positive that my significantly slower human writing and editing skills, are much better.

Register for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the greatest advancements in worldwide innovation, with analysis from BBC correspondents around the world.

Outside the UK? Sign up here.